I figured that a post which is continually updated with links to each part of each series on this blog would be very useful. So, here you go!
A Plethora of Prima Facie Problems for Classical Theism
As the title suggests, this post is not some decisive refutation of classical theism. Definitely not. Classical theism is a formidable, fruitful, and deeply intellectually respectable research program. Rather, it is a short post presenting a number of prima facie (i.e. at first glance; upon first inspection; seems or appears true on the face of it) problems for classical theism.
Read more “A Plethora of Prima Facie Problems for Classical Theism”
From Necessary Being to Unchangeable Being?
One listener to my recent YouTube presentation on the channel Crusade Against Ignorance objects to my claim that the inference from necessary being to unchangeable being is a non-sequitur. Here is that person’s objection:
Research Update!
To those of you interested in my research projects, here are some brief updates:
Media Appearances!
If you haven’t checked them out already, check out the two following videos!
Discussion with Graham Oppy and Josh Rasmussen on the nature of ultimate reality:
My critical appraisal of Cameron Bertuzzi’s three proofs of God’s existence:
I hope they serve you!
Author: Joe
Email: NaturalisticallyInclined@gmail.com
Play-Doh and Classical Theism: A Tension?
Introduction
Suppose you work at a Play-Doh factory. Suppose further you work in the “red division”, the part of the factory dedicated to creating, forming, and packaging red Play-Doh. All you see every day is red Play-Doh coming out of the machines.
Introducing Steinhart’s “More Precisely: The Math You Need to Do Philosophy” (Part 1)
Welcome to the first installment of my series on Eric Steinhart’s More Precisely: The Math You Need to Do Philosophy! This will be a series covering in depth the content of Steinhart’s book. Think of this series like an extended crash course. I will systematically proceed through the book’s main sections, explicating and expounding upon the essential concepts and examples contained therein.
Read more “Introducing Steinhart’s “More Precisely: The Math You Need to Do Philosophy” (Part 1)”
Media Appearance: Discussing Existential Inertia
I had the privilege of discussing some of my recent research on existential inertia with my friend Micah on Youtube. Here is the link. Enjoy!
Theories of Mind (Part 8): Final Assessment
This post marks the eighth and final installment in my series on four prominent theories concerning the nature of the mind. Note, of course, that I will be covering the nature of the mind in even greater depth in future posts on this blog. This series, however, has finally come to an end. In this final post, then, I will give a final assessment of plausibility of the four theories. For requisite context, it would be best to check out Parts 1, 2, 3, and 4, and 5, and 6, and 7. Let’s get into it! Read more “Theories of Mind (Part 8): Final Assessment”
Theories of Mind (Part 7): Churchland’s Eliminative Materialism
This post marks the seventh installment in my series on the nature of the mind. In this post, we will critically evaluate Churchland’s eliminative materialism. For requisite context, it would be best to check out Parts 1, 2, 3, and 4, and 5, and 6. Let’s get this bread!
Read more “Theories of Mind (Part 7): Churchland’s Eliminative Materialism”